Nice Guy Higuain or Monster Suarez? The New Badass Arsenal Know What They Want


In the wake of Arsenal audacious (or controversy) bid of £40,000,001 for Suarez, Gooners everywhere have been divided like the parting of the Red Sea. And we could assume that Liverpool fans felt insulted by that cheeky additional one pound coin. Apparently that weird amount of bid was designed based on advice from Suarez agent, in order to trigger one clause in his contract. Liverpool and the player camp have different interpretations of that clause and no doubt Arsenal had decided to exploit it. Whatever the outcome, this bid will unsettle the player and provoke debates among fans, agents and lawyers for the coming days.

I won’t discuss Suarez controversy here. I’d rather recommend this excellent post, The Suarez Dilemma, for the debate on his moral and wrongdoings. Let’s us focus on the Arsenal side. Did we really want him or Higuain? Napoli seem certain to sign Higuain within today or tomorrow, and for some Arsenal fans it was considered as a miss opportunity for the Gunners. We decided to drop out of a cheaper player pursuit and put all of our eggs inside one controversy basket (that bitey racist as they called him). But let’s check the facts again. Did we really lose Higuain or was Suarez our target from the very beginning?

Transfer Timeline 

A lot of things happened in the month of June and July. I tried to gather data from several news outlet and made a compilation of transfer rumors related with Higuain and Suarez in these two months.

June

01 – In the month of May, Juventus declared interest in Higuain. They’re looking for a top striker. On first of June, Higuain came out with a statement: “I’ve decided to leave Real Madrid.”

11 – Arsenal made Higuain enquiry. Report said we’re ready to break our transfer record.

20 – Arsenal tabled a £21M bid for Higuain, Juventus couldn’t match it, dropped their interest.

24 – Higuain’s father’s comment on the bid said his son might be interested to play in the Premier League

July

03 – Arsenal increased bid to £23M. Report said Real Madrid asked for higher price, demanded £25.5M.

04- Higuain’s father said deal was close, Madrid allowed us for negotiation of personal term with Higuain. Several media confirmed Higuain will fly to London in the next few days. On the same day, report of betting suspension on Suarez to Arsenal arose. Apparently on 3rd July, there were lots of bets put on Suarez to Arsenal transfer.

07 – Arsenal bid £30M + £5M add-on for Suarez.

08 – Perez came out saying Real Madrid never received a bid for Higuain.

15 – Liverpool came out in public saying there was an offer from Arsenal for Suarez and that they had rejected it.

16 – Napoli sold Cavani for £54.4M to PSG.

17 – Napoli declared interest in Higuain.

19 – Rumor of Arsenal preparing a second bid of £40M bid for Suarez

22 – Napoli bid for Higuain, and the bid was accepted. Higuain asked time for considering future (probably waiting for Arsenal to come back with improved bid)

23 – Instead of coming back for Higuain, Arsenal submitted a second bid of £40M+£1 for Suarez.

Napoli agreed £31.8M Higuain fee.

24 – Higuain agreed personal term with Napoli.

So what’s your call on this issue after checking the timeline? Did Arsenal lose Higuain or drop Higuain for Suarez?

My “conclusion” of above interlinked events:

1. Arsenal have fund to bid in excess of £20M, £30M and even £40M.

2. Higuain was Arsenal first target considering the relative easiness to sign. The player wanted out, Madrid wanted to sell albeit at their own valuation. Suarez was listed but not considered yet due to his high price and probably anticipating the eventual bidding war with Madrid.

3. Arsenal and Madrid have agreed at £25.5M fee for Higuain but Madrid hiked the price to £34.5M (equivalent to from €30m to €40m) after Arsenal’s talk with Higuain.

4. Arsenal were clearly disappointed with Madrid unprofessional manner (probably giving them the middle finger). Arsenal might rate Higuain as rotational player to compete with Giroud upfront, but not as the £30M main striker. Wenger said in pre-season tour that the problem with Giroud was not quality but quantity (we have only one striker capable of playing upfront – sorry Theo).

5. To piss off Madrid, Arsenal dropped Higuain interest and went totally for Madrid’s target, Luis Suarez. “Why should we settle with your back up striker when we could afford your transfer target?” This might be what Ivan thought of at that heated moment.

6. Ivan consulted Wenger, and Wenger gave his approval. Probably he was more than happy since he rated Suarez very highly. A 30 goals a season striker, someone who can create his own goal, and who could play as LW. Suddenly, we would be provided with more variations of combinations. Wenger was salivating at the prospect of starting Suarez, Giroud and Walcott upfront.

7. Some ITKs heard Wenger and Ivan Gazidis conversation. Cheekily put lots of bets on Suarez to Arsenal. This happened on the 3rd of July. The same day Madrid informed us of the Higuain “new” price. Quick decision on transfer twist was made by Wenger and Gazidis.

8. Poor Higuain a victim of Madrid’s greed. Arsenal then bid for Suarez with a opening bid of £30M+£5M add-on, matching what Madrid asked for Higuain. Madrid learned about this new development, got very angry and asked Marca to write about it (Headline translation: Why did this “crazy” Arsenal bid for Suarez rather than increase their bid for Higuain, at our price?). Perez also came out in public saying they never received a bid from Arsenal. He was so pissed off that he lied in public for the hundredth time.

9. Liverpool rejected Arsenal first bid. The agents informed Arsenal of the £40M clause. Madrid at the end got what they wanted with around £3M less from cash-rich Napoli. Inflated price for sure, but we can expect that after Napoli sold Cavani as the mega signing of this summer (cue: Liverpool after Torres sale).

10. Arsenal have moved on from Higuain and look confident to secure Suarez with that controversial clause. Helped by his agent, they designed a cheeky £40M+£1 bid.
They believed a bid over £40M shall be enough to release Suarez from Liverpool. But the management of Liverpool interpreted the clause differently. This bid certainly would upset them. Probably this was designed for that purpose. To incite uproar in the Liverpool camp. Why? Because Arsenal are not the nice selling club anymore. We’re the badass buying club now. Remember how the big boys used to unsettle or tap up our players? We’re doing it now to Liverpool, unfortunately.

So what’s next? Liverpool certainly were not entertained with our cheeky bid.

For this transfer to happen, Suarez needs to agitate for a move. And we wouldn’t bid for him if there was no interest from his side. I think he will pull a “RVP” on Liverpool and Liverpool eventually will succumb. They should learn from our mistake. It’s better to let the player leave early and go for his replacements (they could buy more than one player with that money) than doing it at the deadline. We know it’s not nice, but that’s the thing of we have to get used to for becoming a “buying club”.

How about Madrid? IMHO they will go for Bale and they can’t afford both. They haven’t signed a galacticos while their rival have signed Neymar. There was also no bid from Madrid to Liverpool so far. There’s only a mention of interest if the player is priced at £25M. Can Madrid afford a £40M player? Yes, absolutely they can. But can they afford £40M+£60M transfer at the same summer on the top of spending more than £60M already for 4 new players?

Let’s wait and see. Arsenal are prepared to finish this war they started until the end of the transfer window. Suarez or none. It’s a gamble worth taking just like when United signed Van Pursestring. They waited and waited until the disgusting public statement, the agitation, and finally got the only but the best striker they wanted near the end of transfer window (middle of August). And basically we’re doing the same thing now. So be patient.

I personally think Suarez will join us in August but he certainly will not do it based on the voice of the “little boy” inside of him. He is a monster, rite? He suits this new badass “buying club” Arsenal.

Let me know of your version in the comment sections. Feel free to do it as you wish but let’s keep the discussion of racism and morality out of this blog. This post is about guessing Arsenal intention not about moral high ground on football players. We can discuss about it another time.🙂

14 thoughts on “Nice Guy Higuain or Monster Suarez? The New Badass Arsenal Know What They Want

  1. 35 million is too damn high for Higuain. A fantastic striker, yes. But at that price? Also, he would definitely have to adapt with certain aspects on/off the pitch should he join Arsenal while Suarez need less.

    Is Suarez a racist? Most of us, including me said yes in two previous season.
    Is Suarez a lovely human being? Yes, based on what he has done to his long-term childhood girlfriend who is his current wife
    Is Suarez a great striker who can play at various positions as we already have our own number 9 in Ollie?

    Yes.

    • Thanks for visiting, mate.
      At first I prefer HIguain over Suarez too. But after seeing Giroud’s performance LIVE, he looked much much better than last season. We need a Suarez type of striker who’s comfortable playing on the flank more than Higuain type which is more similar to Giroud.
      Basically I’m #teamgiroud

      • If we take a look at our 2000-01 signings, we will understand the importance of world cup and adaptation time
        Podolski, Giroud, Cazorla and Monreal, all are internationals fighting for their places. Just like Edu-Pires-Lauren-Wiltord, they’re coming from a non-EPL clubs

      • It’s good that all of our “core” players bar Suarez will start their second season now. So expect Giroud, Poldi and Cazorla to be better this season with the WC incoming. Giroud has the task to oust Benzema from the France main striker position. I think he’ll be the most improved player this season.

  2. To be honest, personally, i think this is something that is too good to be true. Well if you consider his skills maybe we can say “good” but if you think about all the nasty stuff he made or allegedly made, i’m not so sure it is “good” . Too bad for me to want it to happen. Anyway.

    i also write a piece about my prediction on Wenger’s movement this summer (it is an honor to have the noble benhan visits my blog :P). I put 3 variables that would be Wenger’s main reasons for buying a player: player composition, price tag, and current salary.

    Suarez Analysis then would be:
    1. Composition
    we all know we have Giroud up there but no backup. So yes, the “2 players for every position” rule should trigger a buying. But do we need a backup or a mentor or a replacement? We all agree that giroud IS the future, well at least i think so. But Suarez’s profile for sure indicates Giroud is the one who’s going to be the backup. I’m ok if he’s backuping Ronaldo or Messi, but Suarez?

    2. Price Tag
    based on the trend for the past few years (or at least since the day of ashGrove construction) our spending on new players never exceed £20m. This amount starts to become sort of ceiling price for AFC. However, with recent commercial development, e.g Puma, New Emirates deal, other tiny deals with a few companies, our future cash flow seem to wipe out our current long term debt (ignore working capital). So if you do the math using the figures from AFC balance sheet (Total Future Cash – Long Term Debt = Net Cash). BUT thats in the future. We will be able to do a £40m or i was expecting something like £40,000,1886 so John Henry might feel a bit ARSENALized. It’s almost impossible and uneconomical to go from £20m to £40m. It Feels so-not-Arsene-Wenger.

    3. Salary
    i reckon suarez have > £150k/week now? Cmiiw. Are we ready to break our > £150k wage barrier? What happen to other players? Will they all ask for a rise?

    But thats just me being pessimistic. Besides i dont like Suarez coz he is an alleged racist. With £40m i feel can have someone else with better skills and attitude that will suit our VCC value.

    • Hi mate, thanks for commenting. My responses to your comment:

      1. Wenger could play Suarez as CF or LW. Rotating him with Giroud and Podolski or even Walcott. Suddenly we’ll have 4 strikers who could score double digits goals in the league. I think Wenger will start with Suarez – Giroud – Walcott as his main choices. Imagine Giroud dropping a bit from the box and then feeding feeding Suarez and Walcott with his sexy first touch.
      And I rate Suarez as the top three best player in the Premier League last season. Probably the best if he wasn’t banned for months.

      2. Wenger has been saving for the last 7-8 years. I’ve written this article why we did that: https://benhan8.wordpress.com/2012/08/30/model-finansial-arsenal-dan-mengapa-fans-perlu-memahaminya/
      Basically we spent 500M for the new stadium so there were trade offs.
      And in my other article https://benhan8.wordpress.com/2012/09/29/moneyball-wengerball/ I wrote that starting from 2014 we’ll get additional 50-70M a season for Wenger budget (transfer+player wages). And since Emirates and Puma will pay some amount in advanced, the budget would have been increased starting from this season.
      We also have got rid of the deadwoods and could save up to 15-20M per season because of it. Based on AST report, Arsenal should have 70-100M transfer budget this season.

      3. No, he has less than 150K/week and we would offer him 150K/week or even more. No problem since we also offered one traitor last summer that wages. Hey, we even ready to offer Rooney 200K/week which is basically around 10M/season. We’re ready to break our wage structure for one or two top players. The other players have signed long term contract, so should be no problem. Suarez deserves the highest wage since he would the best player in the team if we manage to sign him.

      4. No comment about the racism issue. Have been reminded in the post above. We could discuss about it another time.

  3. Why not chasing Bale instead of Suarez? It will make derby of north London become more interesting, and the main effect is, AFC rating in television will increasing. And the money will flow…😀

    • Ya, Özil kejutan yang luar biasa. Semenjak 2010, memimpikannya bermain untuk Arsenal. Mimpi yang rasanya sulit direalisasikan setelah ia pindah ke Madrid. Daripada Higuain atau Suarez, jauh lebih bermanfaat pembelian Özil ini. Perfect 10, playmaker yang tidak pernah dimiliki Arsenal namun selalu didambakan. He’s a perfect Wenger player.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s